🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial law change that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often spent years generating local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.